Chinese
French
German
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Russian
Spanish
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Twilight Nutcase Bashes Harry Potter
Surely, everyone has made their own opinion about Twilight and Harry Potter. Here is just another comparison of these two movies by a Twilight fan.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
hp didn't copy twilight because the movie sirus black came in was made before the first book of twilight was published and J.K Rowling is one of the richest women in the world and J.K stands for Joanne Kathleen but Kathleen. But Kathleen isnt her middle name the puplisher said to use her initial but she didnt have a middle name the rest is your proplem
i mean the book came out before the first twilight and sirus isnt a werewolf he is a amiguis get your facts right
#1: Twilight's book set is just a carton cage with pictures. Harry Potter's book set is interesting because it has an old style and it's more awesome than the common book set.
Harry Potter did NOT copied twilight because Sirius Black was created before Twilight. So we can also say that Twilight copied Harry Potter.
Twilight's logo is just a normal letter with a swirrel on the "g" while Harry Potter's logo is like old and misterious. And the thing in the "p" of Potter it's a bolt, one of the symbols of Harry Potter. The logo it's also universally known.
Who cares about the meaning of the titles? The story is what counts! And speaking of that, I don't think having sex and when your boyfriend brokes up with you, get in fetal position and jump off a cliff.
Lastly, the authors don't have to be "pretty". And if you don't know who was J.K.Rowling, there's something seriousy wrong with you. She is THE FIRST WOMAN THAT BECAME RICH FOR WRITING BOOKS,people!And she donated almost all to the charity! THAT'S a role model! And like the other commements said, her name is Joanne Kathleen. And you don't have any right to call J.K.Rowling "Loser" okay? if one day (Hope that never happens) you get a physical or an intellectual dissabilitie and your parents can't afford it, Lumos is one of the charities that will help you. And who's the president of "Lumos"? J.K.Rowling. So don't insult neither Harry Potter or J.K.Rowling!
#1: Twilight's book set is just a carton cage with pictures. Harry Potter's book set is interesting because it has an old style and it's more awesome than the common book set.
Harry Potter did NOT copied twilight because Sirius Black was created before Twilight. So we can also say that Twilight copied Harry Potter.
Twilight's logo is just a normal letter with a swirrel on the "g" while Harry Potter's logo is like old and misterious. And the thing in the "p" of Potter it's a bolt, one of the symbols of Harry Potter. The logo it's also universally known.
Who cares about the meaning of the titles? The story is what counts! And speaking of that, I don't think having sex and when your boyfriend brokes up with you, get in fetal position and jump off a cliff.
Lastly, the authors don't have to be "pretty". And if you don't know who was J.K.Rowling, there's something seriousy wrong with you. She is THE FIRST WOMAN THAT BECAME RICH FOR WRITING BOOKS,people!And she donated almost all to the charity! THAT'S a role model! And like the other commements said, her name is Joanne Kathleen. And you don't have any right to call J.K.Rowling "Loser" okay? if one day (Hope that never happens) you get a physical or an intellectual dissabilitie and your parents can't afford it, Lumos is one of the charities that will help you. And who's the president of "Lumos"? J.K.Rowling. So don't insult neither Harry Potter or J.K.Rowling!
you are so stupid, get your facts right before ranting about another fandom you dumbass
I feel like this person is trolling, they even used a picture of Jennifer Aniston instead of J.K.Rowling.
ALRIGHT
A TRIGGERED POTTERHEAD'S GONNA TRASH THIS PARTY
AND SHE'S GONNA DO IT GOOD
Number 1: Uh, hello? Do you even know what you're looking at? IT'S A FRICKEN CASE. A WOODEN FRICKEN (By the looks of it) CASE. And what is the Twilight one? Oh yeah! CARDBOARD. You're saying that a WOODEN CASE, WITH AN ACTUAL NICE PATTERN isn't elegant. Look again, numbskull.
Number 2: You got your dates wrong, buddy. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (the first movie SIRIUS Black appeared in) was released on June 4th, 2004. The FIRST Twilight book was released, you guessed it, A MUCH LATER DATE. November 21st, 2008. So Meyer copied ROWLING, thank you very much.
Number 3: I think we can all agree that the Harry Potter logo is VERY recognizable. When was the last time you saw something like that, huh? That's right, the last time you looked at a Harry Potter book or movie! The Twilight logo? If someone took that font and wrote something else in it, the first thing people would think of wouldn't be of Twilight. Besides, one of the many cool things about the Harry Potter logo? The "P" resembles Harry's scar. Nothing like that in the Twilight logo, now is there?
Number 4: Uh, you just started a religion war with the whole "Twilight represents god" and all that. Great job, buddy. Second, that's what you call a THEORY. THEORIES are not right, they are assumptions. Nice try.
Number 5: Ok, this one triggers me the most. JOANNE KATHLEEN (her grandmother's first name) ROWLING used "J.K Rowling" as her name because at the time, most woman authors didn't get published, so she used her INITIALS (you should have learned what those were in 3rd grade, bud) instead of her name to get a better chance for publishing. Oh, and "It's obvious she isn't that famous?" SHE WROTE ONE OF THE BEST SELLING SERIES OF ALL TIME. SHE WAS THE FIRST PERSON EVER TO BECOME A BILLIONAIRE FROM WRITING BOOKS. Fun fact, she became the first person to lose that title from DONATING TO CHARITY. So, "loser", you say? I think NOT.
Get wrecked.
POTTERHEAD, OUT!
Where do I even start. NOT ALL HP FANS SMOKE POT!!!! IT IS NOT PROOF OF YOUR POINT!!!! “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” book was released in 1999, the first twilight book was released in 2005. And did the twilight movie makers didn’t cast a black actor to play Jacob, did they? So you can’t go around saying that because it makes you look hypocritical. Also, it’s spelled SIRIUS not SERIOUS. Robert Pattinson was Cedric before he was Edward, and he said that Harry Potter is more adventurous than twilight. Molly Weasley even hates twilight. To quote this scene from Deathly Hallows:
Hermione: “There were once three brothers who were traveling down a lonely, winding road at twilight”
Ron: “Midnight. Mum always said midnight”
BOOM! And...
Harry is better than Voldemort
Voldemort is better than Cedric
Cedric is equal to Edward
Harry is better than Edward
So, I’ve just proven why Harry Potter is better than twilight
Post a Comment